Is "religion" coherent?

Some readers may find this mind-bending. I know I still do. I’ve learned my lessons too well,

I have no doubt that ideologies and practices of all kinds—including, for example, Islam and Christianity—can and do promote violence under certain conditions. What I challenge as incoherent is the argument that there is something called religion—a genus of which Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and so on are species—which is necessarily more inclined toward violence than are ideologies and institutions that are identified as secular. Unlike other books on religion and violence, I do not argue that religion either does or does not promote violence, but rather I analyze the political conditions under which the very category of religion is constructed.

William T. Cavanaugh, The Myth of Religious Violence.

My main blog is the Tipsy Teetotaler,